// 29 use cases

Real constraints. Patched anyway.

The same shape of engagement across 19 runtimes — wherever a change window, a certification, or an audit cycle rules out a version upgrade as the answer.

29

Use cases

19

Technologies

25

Industries

Technology
Use case
Industry

29 use cases

CVE PatchingRabbitMQ

Enterprise RabbitMQ CVE Patching & Compliance

A security team needs CVE fixes backported onto RabbitMQ 3.12 or 3.13 without a forced broker upgrade, plus patch evidence an auditor will accept without a follow-up question.

Cross-industry enterprise
CVE PatchingRabbitMQ

RabbitMQ CVE Patching for IoT Messaging

Edge device fleets run RabbitMQ on a hardware refresh cycle measured in years, not sprints. Patches have to land on the broker version already qualified for the fleet.

Connected devices / IoT
CVE PatchingRabbitMQ

RabbitMQ CVE Patching for Energy & SCADA

SCADA messaging infrastructure runs on change windows measured in months. A CVE fix has to be backported onto the exact version already qualified for the environment, not delivered as a version bump.

Energy & utilities
Compliance & AuditRabbitMQ

RabbitMQ CVE Patching for Medical Devices

A certified device can't absorb a broker upgrade -- recertification is its own multi-month project. The CVE fix has to land on the certified version, documented for the next audit cycle.

Healthcare / medical devices
Compliance & AuditRabbitMQ

RabbitMQ CVE Patching for Insurance Services

Claims and underwriting messaging needs CVE coverage that satisfies a SOC 2 or state insurance-department audit without disrupting the integrations built around the current broker version.

Insurance
CVE PatchingRabbitMQ

RabbitMQ CVE Patching for Industrial Automation

Plant-floor messaging can't go down for a broker migration mid-production-run. The fix is backported onto the qualified version and scheduled inside an existing maintenance window.

Manufacturing / industrial automation
Extended SupportRabbitMQ

Commercial RabbitMQ Support & Patch Management

Community RabbitMQ carries no SLA and no patch guarantee. The baseline engagement: ongoing CVE monitoring, backported fixes, and a contractual response time.

Any enterprise running community RabbitMQ
Vendor ExitRabbitMQ

RabbitMQ Licensing & Extended Support

Tanzu RabbitMQ's licensing terms changed the calculus. Teams need CVE-patched continuity on community RabbitMQ without adopting a new commercial licensing model.

Leaving a commercial distribution
Compliance & AuditApache Kafka

Kafka CVE Patching & Compliance

A regulated Kafka deployment needs CVE remediation and audit evidence without stepping up to a full Confluent-scale commercial support contract.

Regulated enterprise
CVE PatchingSpring Framework / Spring Boot

Spring CVE Patching for Retail Banking

Spring applications behind consumer banking need a CVE fix landed on the version already through change control -- not a framework major-version rewrite mid-cycle.

Retail banking
Extended SupportSpring Framework / Spring Boot

Managing Open-Source CVE Risk on Spring

Spring Framework 5.3 and Spring Boot 2.7 reached community end of life. This is the CVE-risk conversation before an auditor has it for you.

Enterprise Java
Compliance & AuditSpring Framework / Spring Boot

Spring Compliance for Government Systems

Federal systems running Spring need FedRAMP-aligned compliance evidence for a component that's already past community support -- documented, not asserted.

Federal / government
CVE PatchingErlang/OTP

Erlang/OTP CVE Exposure Under a Patched Broker

RabbitMQ has taken no CVEs since its end-of-life date. Erlang/OTP 24, the runtime underneath it, has taken 22 -- one of them at CVSS 10.0. Patching the broker does not patch the runtime.

Cross-industry enterprise
Extended SupportErlang/OTP

Erlang/OTP Extended Support for EOL RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ pins a supported Erlang/OTP range per broker line. For the older broker lines, every Erlang release in that range is itself past end of life -- so patching the runtime means moving the broker too.

Messaging platform teams
Extended SupportApache ZooKeeper

Apache ZooKeeper Extended Support Past EOL

ZooKeeper sits under Kafka, HBase, Solr and NiFi as the coordination layer. It is rarely anyone's named responsibility, and its 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 lines are all past community end of life.

Data platform teams
EOL MigrationApache Solr

Apache Solr Extended Support Past EOL

Solr 7 and 8 are past community end of life. Moving to 9 means a full reindex and a Java baseline change -- and a relevance profile nobody budgeted for revalidating.

Search & discovery platforms
EOL MigrationApache Camel

Apache Camel 3 Extended Support & Jakarta Migration

Camel 3 is past community end of life. Camel 4 moved to the Jakarta EE namespaces and raised the Java baseline to 17 -- and drags Spring Boot 2 to 3 along with it.

Integration platform teams
EOL MigrationApache NiFi

Apache NiFi 1.x Extended Support Past EOL

NiFi 1.x is past community end of life, and NiFi 2 is a breaking change -- not a version bump a running dataflow estate absorbs on a security timeline.

Data engineering teams
EOL MigrationHazelcast

Hazelcast IMDG Extended Support & Migration

Hazelcast IMDG 3.x to Platform 5 has no rolling upgrade path. For a cluster holding live session or cache state, that makes the upgrade an availability problem, not just a version problem.

In-memory data platform teams
Extended SupportApache Ignite

Apache Ignite 2.x Extended Support

Apache Ignite 3 is a substantially different system from Ignite 2, not an in-place upgrade. For most Ignite 2 estates, the pragmatic path is a supported 2.x, not a rewrite on a security deadline.

In-memory compute platform teams
EOL MigrationApache ActiveMQ Classic

ActiveMQ Classic Extended Support & Artemis Path

ActiveMQ Classic and Artemis are different brokers sharing a name. Artemis speaks OpenWire, which makes the migration look easy -- until the store, the network-of-brokers topology and the operational tooling don't carry over.

Enterprise messaging teams
Extended SupportPostgreSQL

PostgreSQL Extended Support Past Community EOL

PostgreSQL drops a major version off community support every year. A major upgrade means a dump/restore or logical replication cutover -- planned downtime for a database that usually can't have any.

Cross-industry enterprise
EOL MigrationApache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat Extended Support & Jakarta Migration

Tomcat 8.5 is past end of life and Tomcat 9 follows. Tomcat 10 moved to the Jakarta namespace, so the upgrade changes every servlet import in the deployed application, not just the container.

Enterprise Java teams
Extended Support.NET

.NET Extended Support Past Microsoft EOL

.NET LTS releases carry three years of support. For an application estate on a slower modernization cycle, that clock runs out before the migration budget arrives.

Enterprise application teams
Extended SupportNode.js

Node.js Extended Support Past Community EOL

Node.js 18 is past community end of life. Moving a production service to a newer major means revalidating a dependency tree that was locked against the old one.

Application platform teams
Vendor ExitRedis

Redis Extended Support After the Licence Change

Redis changed licence to RSALv2 and SSPLv1, adding AGPLv3 from Redis 8. Teams on an older Redis line now face a version decision and a licensing decision in the same conversation.

Cross-industry enterprise
Vendor ExitGemFire / Geode

GemFire Extended Support & Apache Geode Migration

Tanzu GemFire licensing changed the calculus. Apache Geode is the open-source path, but the data grid holds live state that can't be migrated on a licensing deadline.

Financial services & enterprise
Extended SupportApache Pulsar

Apache Pulsar Production Support

Pulsar is three systems in a trench coat -- brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper. Running it in production without a support relationship means owning all three when something goes wrong.

Streaming platform teams
CVE PatchingSpring Security

Spring Security Extended Support Past EOL

Spring Security 5.x went end of life alongside Spring Framework 5.3. An unpatched CVE in the authentication and authorization layer is a different severity conversation from one anywhere else in the stack.

Enterprise Java teams

Running one of these already, or something close to it?

Bring us the version, the compliance framework, and the constraint that's ruling out an upgrade. We'll scope it on the call.